On 02/11/2014 05:25 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 16:43 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/11/2014 02:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Unless Red Hat desktop team is interested in shifting some of its focus to
Fedora itself. From what Christian says, I think that actually *is* the case
-- if Gnome is chosen as the Fedora Workstation desktop, that means more
people given time to work on that specifically. Right?
Under no circumstance should we be doing that since we pride ourselves
of working with/for upstream and thus as an distribution we represent
"upstreaming" to extent in the linux ecosystem.
Here is a fallout [1] in Gnome for Red Hat/Fedora developers first and
foremost for not doing that.
Are you saying that we should give up on Fedora and instead just work on
upstream GNOME ? Even more than we already are ? Thats the road for
Fedora to become even more irrelevant, not less.
Given that we are at all time high shipping components in the
distribution what evidence do you have we are becoming irrelevant in the
first place?
And if that is happening ( which I sincerely doubt ) what is the root
cause from it?
I'm sorry, but I increasingly cannot make any sense of your
contributions in this discussion.
What I'm saying is that we should first and foremost focus on
upstreaming and work with upstream rather then implementation/integrate
*first* downstream with us then push upstream.
JBG
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
