On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm intentionally breaking the threading here since I think it's a top-level > topic. The following is from Christian: > > I agree, and also, I think the direction has gone a little differently from > what we were originally thinking about with the "Workstation" name. As I > noted elsewhere, things going differently from my first thoughts is the > process working. :) > > If there's going to be a name change, I think it's probably better somewhat > sooner rather than later. It might be a good idea to talk with Fedora > Marketing too. So... yeah. Open floor on this idea. Does "workstation" > really convey what this product will be all about? What would be better? > Plain old "Fedora Desktop" is still on the table, for sure. "Fedora Bob" is > probably a bad idea.... Q: Do you want to keep Fedora Worksation? A: No. Q: Why? I'm going to say this one more time. It is a really BAD idea to define "Fedora Workstation" or "Fedora Desktop" as 1 single experience. Yes, I know about the "vision". I guess you guys forgot that GTK+ can run on multiple DEs. Note: I do think Fedora Server and Fedora Cloud are absolutely GREAT ideas. Dan -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
