On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 06:23 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Find better examples (eg. ones that don't misinterpret e-mails I've personally > sent and that you're twisting to try and make a point). It was a terrible example, but he's really just saying "do not patch GNOME unless truly necessary." I absolutely agree: a big part of what makes Fedora arguably the #1 GNOME distro is that it rarely patches GNOME (with the exception of fixes that are first committed upstream) and almost never changes default settings. Arch and openSUSE follow the same policy, and that's why they're often recommended as well. Other distros start by adding minimize buttons, or desktop icons... I lose interest in those distros real fast.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
