On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 08:57 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > It was a terrible example, but he's really just saying "do not patch > GNOME unless truly necessary." I absolutely agree: a big part of what > makes Fedora arguably the #1 GNOME distro is that it rarely patches > GNOME (with the exception of fixes that are first committed upstream) > and almost never changes default settings. Arch and openSUSE follow the > same policy, and that's why they're often recommended as well. Other > distros start by adding minimize buttons, or desktop icons... I lose > interest in those distros real fast. You are totally right. Thanks for finding the agreeable statement in this thread: We don't want to diverge from upstream needlessly, that should be very clear. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
