On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 16:14 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Feb 20, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > You might need to provide more details and background in posts like > > this, Chris, considering the context. I don't think the desktop team is > > as familiar with the ins and outs of installer partitioning as the > > anaconda and QA teams. They don't deal with it every day. :) > > OK I'm not sure how or what to provide that wouldn't also be obscenely verbose. > > My premise is that the present installer paths (Automatic and Manual) > do not constitute limiting the user interaction to the minimum. But > maybe all or most WG members consider the installer already meets > these requirements? > > For comparison, by at least two orders of magnitude, the Windows and > OS X installers are more minimalist. They each offer a handful of > installed outcomes (including dual boot), whereas Anaconda > Automatic/guided path alone offers dozens of outcomes, and the > Manual/custom paths offers hundreds possibly infinite. It would help for this audience to quantify exactly what 'automatic' and 'manual' *are*, and the range of choices they currently expose. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
