On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:03:47 -0500 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kevin Fenzi (kevin@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > Another aspect of xfs we may want to investigate and get feedback > > from filesystem folks is how well xfs works on 32bit these days. > > > > RHEL7 doesn't have a 32bit version in their beta, so they only need > > to support 64bit xfs. Does the fact that we expect to have 32bit > > workstation and/or server weigh into this decision any? > > We expect to have a 32-bit workstation or server? > > Not trying to troll, but I don't know that any of these were > specifically discussed or specified in the products - are there any > arches where Fedora currently exists that we don't necessarily care > about having a particular product on? (For example, if you expand to > secondary arches, I'd question the idea of s390 Workstation.) > > Bill, who does have a 32-bit x86 server under his home desk... Yeah, I don't know. That would be a good thing to decide for: a) each of the products. b) fedora in general c) spins kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
