Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Kevin Fenzi (kevin@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Another aspect of xfs we may want to investigate and get feedback from
> filesystem folks is how well xfs works on 32bit these days. 
> 
> RHEL7 doesn't have a 32bit version in their beta, so they only need to
> support 64bit xfs. Does the fact that we expect to have 32bit
> workstation and/or server weigh into this decision any?

We expect to have a 32-bit workstation or server? 

Not trying to troll, but I don't know that any of these were specifically
discussed or specified in the products - are there any arches where Fedora
currently exists that we don't necessarily care about having a particular
product on? (For example, if you expand to secondary arches, I'd question
the idea of s390 Workstation.)

Bill, who does have a 32-bit x86 server under his home desk...

-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux