On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Elad Alfassa <elad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Your assumption is that we use Intel's definition of a "workstation" when we > define the "workstation" product is simply wrong. > > Also, I think we need a modern desktop that supports hi-dpi screens, touch > interface (both are going to be fairly common in laptops very soon), with > modern components (systemd's logind session management, wayland instead of > Xorg). > > Can Mate do hi-dpi? Or wayland? Does it support multi-seat configurations > out of the box? Does it have a proper support for touch-based devices? An > on-screen-keyboard? Integrated cloud services? Integrated web apps? The > answer to all these questions is absolutely no. > > Not to mention GNOME actually has far more people working on it and testing > it - even outside fedora. > > Mate is about holding back and refusing to adapt to changes. Fedora is about > moving forward as quickly as possible. Mate is incompatible with that by > definition, and since the "workstation" product will be the main product of > Fedora, it makes no sense to put a desktop like Mate in it by default. Please don't spread inaccurate information about MATE and educate yourself. http://wiki.mate-desktop.org/roadmap Dan -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop