On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 23:51 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> As I said before, I think the best choice is just to give the user the option. > > At that point, we don't have a product, we just have another way to > choose your own adventure. We *already* have that; it's called Fedora. > AFAICS, re-implementing choose-your-own-adventure within one of the > Products is a great way to spend several months achieving nothing much > at all. > > How would any of the stuff in the PRD actually work if you could choose > any desktop you liked and still be running Fedora Workstation? I think you missed my point that we really don't have "choose your own adventure". Most of our installed base is already GNOME. I also made the point earlier that I feel like all this Fedora.next stuff is going to do is take Fedora and GNOME and simply put a label of "workstation" on it. Can you quite honestly tell me how you think things will be different in Fedora.next? Can you give me some concrete bullet points on how you think Fedora.next will be any more attractive to third parties? Once again, I can't stress enough and say that I seriously am not seeing any difference between Fedora.now and Fedora.next. Besides taking what we currently have and saying "There, now we have Fedora.next". What do you really think the rest of the world will think? I'll tell you what they will think. They'll say things like: "OK, so what?" "Something something lipstick on a pig" "The more things change.." "That's nice Fedora, so what's new?" Sorry. I'm just not buying it. Dan -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
