----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> > To: desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:24:14 PM > Subject: Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation > > > On 02/11/2014 05:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 17:28 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > >> What I'm saying is that we should first and foremost focus on > >> upstreaming and work with upstream rather then implementation/integrate > >> *first* downstream with us then push upstream. > > "The plan is that we decide on features we want for Fedora, work on them > > where most natural, which means upstream in many cases and then as soon > > as they are ready pull them into Fedora." > > > > -- Christian Schaller, this list, about 150 minutes ago. > > And in the same mail he seems to me, contracting himself > > "So instead of setting the development priorities in a RHEL or upstream > context, > we are trying to do so in a Fedora context." > It is not a contradiction, the difference here often is in the details. To give an example. We want to enable the installation of alternative desktops in the Software installer. We do this because we are looking at what we need from a Fedora context. If we set the priorities in a upstream, in this case GNOME context, then this would never be a feature in the sense that from a 'GNOME' point of view there is no value in being able to install another desktop. Christian -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
