On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:31:22PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Reading the summary, I would like to comments about the DE discussion. > Barring the long emotional argument about favourite DE to recommend, > I think the reminder is Fedora is all about > displaying new technology with GNOME as the default for distribution > while alternative will still be available. KDE still has its place > on section like ARM architectures where there is no standard in GPU. > Overall, it means there is two majors DE to focus. > > What needs to work on is the solid foundation of the workstation > part by taking advantage of the immense work done by systemd and the > adoption of recommendation done by freedesktop.org. Documentation > will need to play crucial roles for developing applications (one of > complains towards GTK3 compared to Qt). > > I wait for the decision of Workstation Group. No matter the result, > let's keep improving the entire infrastructure within Fedora. Luya, what a great point you've made here. There are undoubtedly ways to contribute and improve the upstream in addition to helping deal with Fedora and upstream bugs. The fd.o efforts have yielded a lot of good results, and I for one hope the Fedora community continues to collaborate there! -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
