On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 09:18 +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 07:41 +0100, drago01 wrote: > >> What's the point in filling a FESCo ticket without having the people > >> that maintain it ask for it? > > > > Uh? From the discussion that went on, I was under the impression that > > getting the update into the Fedora repos was the preferred path, and > > talking to FESCo the next step. > > I can't speak for other but: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2014-January/008768.html > > Maybe you should talk to Matthias first. Anyway 3.12 isn't even > released yet so this > is a bit premature. Hey, sorry for not chiming in earlier. Yes, I think starting the fesco process for this is a bit premature. My thought was that we should get the kinks in the copr workflow worked out in the 3.11.x beta releases, give 3.12.0 some soaking time, and let people try out how coprs work in practice for a large set of interelated packages like this. Around the 3.12.1 time, we can look at whether it is desirable/feasible to turn this from a separate repo into an update for f20 - if it is, we'll have to approach fesco for approval at that point. In any case, I'm happy that we are making this experiment. Good to try something new every now and then. Matthias -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
