Re: DE discussion summary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 12:09 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 
> > Hat, it wouldn't be viable at all. When there's a Fedora release
> > blocker that needs a few days of developer time, who do you think
> > picks up the tab?
> 
> Just for the accuracy of the record, we already block Fedora releases on
> KDE, and Red Hat by no means always 'picks up' that tab. We had a fairly
> nasty KDE blocker for F20 -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983110 - whose tab was
> 'picked up' collaboratively by folks including a Red Hat developer
> (Rex), a non-RH Fedora contributor (Kevin), and a Canonical developer
> (Ryan Lortie).

Just FYI, Rex is not Red Hat developer ;-). But there's pretty nice group
of folks within Red Hat working on KDE, finally more in upstream. New
NetworkManager applet, new login manager, screen configuration etc.

Jaroslav


> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> 
> --
> desktop mailing list
> desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux