Sent from mYphone
On Mar 30, 2014 12:05 AM, "Rahul Sundaram" <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Liam < wrote:
>>
>> In not sure this would constitute a "significant " change, but assuming it were, can you point to where this decision has been formally stated? I'm certainly aware that Fedora is upstream first, but I believe we carry patches in cases where we have to.
>
>
> The general guidance is to avoid this as much as possible
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Staying_close_to_upstream_projects
>
The Distribution Integration possibility might be the relevant issue.
Again, I'm not sure this qualifies because I don't think Workstation is quite at the point of discussing these types of ux issues, yet.
>>
>> That may not be appropriate in this particular case but I think the needs of the Fedora project have to come before upstream.
>
> Divergence may not be necessary and is always a maintenance burden. So you work primarily in the space of upstream projects for core development and focus within Fedora should be as a point of integration and projects/infrastructure that help with that.
>
Of course. That's why I said that Fedora tries to upstream as much as possible, but, as your document says, that's not always possible.
In brief, I don't think we are disagreeing:)
Best/Liam
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
