That was my original thinking too, but someone pointed out (I think maybe Bastien?) that UPNP IGD wouldn't work in the local firewall case? ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Robinson" <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> > Ultimately someone should probably integrate the use of the UPNP IGD > standard better into firewalld, we already have gupnp-igd, so that it > can poke firewalld to open up ports dynamically. DLNA is on top of > UPNP so there's technologies there that should work and it would nice > to be able to have IGD support for firewalld in both a separate > firewall/router device and on on local firewalld instances so that > when two UPNP devices are communicating they can dynamically open up > ports on demand. > > Peter > -- > desktop mailing list > desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
