Where's appropriate place to post feedback?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Alberto Ruiz <aruiz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 07:31 -0500, Alex GS wrote:Alex, I appreciate your enthusiasm but I think for the "legacy" use case
> May I make a request? Due to legacy I think MATE because it's based
> on GNOME 2 should be included on that list. That way you have all of
> the GNOME bases covered.
GNOME 3 Classic Mode covers this. We would end up having a redundant
product if we ship both Classic Mode and MATE.
If you have specific ways in which Classic Mode can be improved, the
desktop team is happy to gather feedback and see if we can do something
about it.
>Greetings,
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:12 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 02/14/2014 06:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Frankly speaking I think this is not subject to
> discussion. KDE needs to
> remain a release blocking desktop. Improving our
> workstation product
> should not happen at the cost of KDE or any other
> desktop.
>
>
>
> That should be fine KDE will be the only release blocking
> desktop since WG will have to handle that themselves ( or what
> ever DE ends up being voted as an WG product )
>
> JBG
>
>
>
>
--
Alberto Ruiz
Engineering Manager - Desktop Applications Team
Red Hat, Inc.
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
