On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 06:53 -0500, Christian Schaller wrote: > Hi Adam, > Yes, some items might fall partly or fully upon the base WG, but we (as their 'customers') > need to clearly specify what we need them to deliver. The base WG todo list needs to be > based upon the needs and requirements of the 3 product WGs, not the other way around. I agree there needs to be communication and co-ordination here, I'm just not sure the workstation technical specification is the place for that communication to happen. What I was guessing would happen would be that the 'product' WGs and the base WG would have the discussion in some other forum - a mailing list thread, a different wiki page, whatever - and the requirements formed as a result of that discussion would be a part of the base WG's specification, and the product specifications could then reference the base specification where appropriate. Otherwise it seems like we'll wind up with something unwieldy like the base specification *and* each of the product specifications all containing the same text (or, worse, different text for the same requirements), which seems suboptimal. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
