On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> At least, Virtual Box should be an explicitly targeted and supported platform to run Fedora on (as a guest). Despite its drawbacks, it must be easier to target than hundreds of models, let alone highly closed and quirky hardware like Macs. >> >> If that is ever going to happen, it needs people interested in it to >> actually just make it happen. So if anyone would like to see it work >> well in VirtualBox, then by all means go make it work well in >> VirtualBox. >> >> We need people to show up and do the work, not tell other people what >> should be important. We have no lack of the latter. > > Convincing people who tell others what is or should be important, are effective recruiters and an incentive for other people to show up and do the necessary work. The inverse is not true. Really? People have been telling Fedora that virtualbox is very important since it first came out. Apparently the "recruiting" of people that actually want to see it work well is failing. I don't see that being effective at all. At the end of the day you need people that actually DO, not people that just talk. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
