On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The Workstation product is described as a "platform for development of > server side and client applications". However, the technical specification > does not include any development tools (except a Python stack and the GNOME > Javascript stack, but those are incidental dependencies). The package list in the Tech spec is stale. I've sent an updated package set to this list and I plan on getting the kickstarts into spins-kickstart soon. > Based on a review of what the other working groups are doing, it seems that > we won't end up with any development tools at all in the inner circle of > Fedora.next. Based on review of a stale, in progress list. > I understand that all products will be delivered with the Everything > repositories enabled, so GCC, autoconf, cmake, Boost, OpenJDK, Eclipse, and > so on will all be available. But I had hoped for a curated subset of > packages which could receive additional attention (and eventually be held to > higher standards). > > How can we avoid having a developer workstation that does not include the > full range of development tools? Send patches to the kickstart, or suggestions for additions, to this list? It's really not complicated. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
