-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/22/2014 04:54 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote: > Hi all. As you may know, we need to create a comps group for Fedora > Workstation. > > The comps file already has a comps group named > "developer-workstation-environment", but it contains things that > we might not want to put in the default Workstation environment. > > So, should we "take over" that group and change it to fit our > needs, or create a new group? if we create a new group, what should > we call it? should the comps group be named fedora-workstation, > workstation, or something completely different? > > All I need is your input regarding naming here, I'll do all the > boring part (adding it to comps and making sure we don't add any > packages in the kickstart file). We should probably arrange it so that both the Workstation and Server products follow the same approach for dealing with comps. In my ideal world, it would be possible during a net install for us to have a single high-level package selection in Anaconda that was: * Fedora Workstation * Fedora Server * Fedora Custom (Leading to the traditional dialogs). Thoughts? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlN95NYACgkQeiVVYja6o6M9vACfVRWjY+zBZpinp0SA2bhGUQuK ftYAoIX8LsPoODV0cZGjhIv9vLbunYYt =MoSr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
