On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Elad Alfassa wrote: >> >> Personally I think having virtualization that works out-of-the-box is an >> excellent selling point and we should keep gnome-boxes (and libvirt) by >> default. > > > Could you provide a reasoning that isn't based on opinion? Based on the WS > PRD and other wiki pages virtualization isn't covered by "providing a > platform for development of various types of applications." Read use-cases 2 and 3 of the PRD. Virtualization is highlighted there. > I also would bet hard cash that outside a subset of Red Hat customers that > use libvirt, most people will not use libvirt. Let's drop the FOSS bias and Now who's reasoning on opinion? This is Fedora. We don't drop FOSS bias. If there's a problem with a FOSS solution, then in theory it gets reported and fixed. > face reality. No offense to the individuals who work on it. If libvirt and > it's substantial baggage was dropped it would open up room for docs > (GTK2+GTK3 docs are only ~2.5MB each xz compressed) or other packages more > valuable to the WS product's mission. Space really isn't an issue at the moment. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
