On Thu, 17.04.14 15:40, Thomas Woerner (twoerner@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > I will not reply to your personal opinion. But "firewalld is the > number 1 slowest component on Fedora, right now."? Yes. It is. > See below: > > I just did a fresh F-20 gnome installation and applied all updates. > After 3 boots I used systemd-analyze and systemd-analyze blame: > > F-20 x86_64 virt guest (after 2 boots): > > Startup finished in 528ms (kernel) + 1.027s (initrd) + 4.208s > (userspace) = 5.765s > 2.091s plymouth-quit-wait.service > 1.373s firewalld.service > 878ms accounts-daemon.service > 833ms libvirtd.service > 687ms rtkit-daemon.service > 615ms avahi-daemon.service > 544ms ModemManager.service > 470ms chronyd.service > 456ms systemd-logind.service plymouth-quit-wait is a special case here. It just waits until everything else is finished and then kills the plymouth boot splash. It doesn't really do anything on its own, it just waits (which the name hopefully indicates). So yes, firewalld is the slowest component... > firewalld is not the "number 1 slowest component on Fedora, right > now.", but it is plymouth-quit-wait. Yeah, this is certainly misleading, but firewalld is really the slowest component. > As you can see, the userspace time varies by about 0.3s after > disabling and also uninstalling firewalld! Yupp, because we parallelize everything. Also, on a number of laptops we now have 2s bootups. If this is the range, then 0.3s is actually a lot. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
