Re: Package List Discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]






----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop" <desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 3:36:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Package List Discussion
> 
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 03:01:33PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > > Windows. If GNOME Boxes, libvirt, etc. is installed by default then I'll
> > > remove it and install VirtualBox. That's not because I prefer VBox - I
> > > don't at all - but because Microsoft provides images for VBox and making
> > > them work nicely with libvirt is a hassle I can do without.
> > This is a very good use case, thanks for bringing this up.
> > Is there anything we could do to make it easier for you? I know
> > VirtualBox distributes their stuff upstream in rpm format, but compiles
> > parts of it (the kernel modules) after installation. Would it make it
> > easier to set up VirtualBox if we included the kernel-devel and gcc
> > packages in the default install?
> 
> Or alternately, can we make it so those provided VBox images _just work_
> with our open virtualization software?

It is on Zeeshans todo list:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723008

> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fedora Project Leader
> --
> desktop mailing list
> desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux