Fedora Development Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Update pushed to F31 updates-testing not happening ?
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Update pushed to F31 updates-testing not happening ?
- Re: HEADS UP: Rawhide rebuild of Python packages with old bytecode version
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
- HEADS UP: Rawhide rebuild of Python packages with old bytecode version
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- HEADS-UP: PJHP 7.4 coming to rawhide
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Fedora-29-updates-testing-20191002.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- cmake 3.15.3 coming to rawhide
- Re: Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- From: Brian (bex) Exelbierd
- Re: How to subscribe to Bugzilla components?
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191001.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Fedora-Rawhide-20191001.n.1 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Planned Outage - koji.fedoraproject.org - 2019-10-02 21:00 UTC
- Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
- CGAL soname "bump" in rawhide
- From: laurent . rineau__fedora
- Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- Unretire nodejs-gaze
- packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
- From: laurent . rineau__fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Fedora-31-20191001.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20191001.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Self-Introduction: Christopher Engelhard
- From: Christopher Engelhard
- Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
- Re: Minimization Objective report
- Re: Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)
- Re: Minimization Objective report
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
- Re: Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190930.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)
- Re: CPE Team Weekly Update
- Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Finding out ownership of packages & branches
- Re: Finding out ownership of packages & branches
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Minimization Objective report
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Finding out ownership of packages & branches
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-09-30)
- Re: can we merge package.cfg into master ?
- Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
- Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
- Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Reminder: Summer time changes in the next few weeks
- Re: Minimization Objective report
- hypre soname bump in rawhide
- Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
- Re: Self Introduction: Brian Sipos
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Re: Minimization Objective report
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190930.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-09-30)
- Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
- Fedora-Rawhide-20190930.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
- Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
- Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Self Introduction: Jérémy Bertozzi
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
- Orphaned paper-icon-theme
- Orphaned libfixposix (leaf package)
- Re: gnome-subtitles (mono) dependency on libenchant.so.1 not picked up automatically
- suitesparse 5.4 coming to rawhide soon
- Backend storage clean-up
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Re: koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
- Re: koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
- koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Orphaned pegdown (leaf package)
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: gnome-subtitles (mono) dependency on libenchant.so.1 not picked up automatically
- gnome-subtitles (mono) dependency on libenchant.so.1 not picked up automatically
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190928.n.2 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Fedora-Rawhide-20190928.n.2 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
- Re: Self Introduction: Brian Sipos
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Package build of usbauth-notifier and setxid whitelist
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190928.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Fedora-31-20190928.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Branched 20190928.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
- Re: Minimization Objective report
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Minimization Objective report
- Re: kata containers: adding a docker runtime
- 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190927.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Fedora-31-20190927.n.1 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Question about package module development
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Fedora 31 Final blocker status email #3
- Re: Minimization Objective report
- [Test-Announce] 2019-09-30 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 31 Blocker Review Meeting
- [Test-Announce] 2019-09-30 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- Re: Question about package module development
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
- Help needed with reviewing 2 trivial Golang packages
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- A Gmane NNTP gatway test
- Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
- can we merge package.cfg into master
- Unresponsive Maintainer: bpereto
- From: Felix Kaechele via devel
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- dogpile.cache has switched to the MIT license
- Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
- Re: Question about package module development
- Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- plplot soname bump in rawhide
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
- From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
- CPE Team Weekly Update
- Re: Question about package module development
- Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
- Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
- Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
- Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
- Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
- Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
- From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
- Re: MPFR 4
- Question about package module development
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Self Introduction: Brian Sipos
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Robert Marcano via devel
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Logs from Open NeuroFedora team meeting at 1500 UTC on Thursday, 26th September.
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Fedora-31-20190926.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190926.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
- Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
- Re: new non-responsive maintainer policy
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: new non-responsive maintainer policy
- new non-responsive maintainer policy
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
- Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
- Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
- FedoraRespin-30-updates-20190925.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
- Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-09-26 16:00 UTC)
- Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
- Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
- Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
- From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
- Re: kata containers: adding a docker runtime
- Re: Join the package collection maintainers: Visit src.fp.o to request rights?
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Re: Dependency issues with mono on F31?
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
- Re: glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Re: glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
- Minimization Objective report
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
- Intent to retire cudd
- The last regular Minimization Team Meeting notes 2019-09-25
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31
- Join the package collection maintainers: Visit src.fp.o to request rights?
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- Fedora-31-20190925.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190925.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
- Re: intent to orphan: vte, trac*
- Re: Dependency issues with mono on F31?
- notify-python orphan notice
- Re: plan to retire llvm3.9 from f31+
- Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
- Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
- kata containers: adding a docker runtime
- From: Christophe de Dinechin
- plan to retire llvm3.9 from f31+
- From: Jens-Ulrik Petersen
- Dependency issues with mono on F31?
- Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival
- Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
- Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
- From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190924.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
- Re: What projects can we highlight for Hacktoberfest?
- Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
- HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting
- Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
- Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
- Re: Request to add new groups to comps.xml
- Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival
- Open NeuroFedora team meeting: 1500 UTC on Thursday, 26th September
- Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
- From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
- Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
- Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
- Re: Package build of usbauth-notifier and setxid whitelist
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190923.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Fedora-Rawhide-20190923.n.1 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Package build of usbauth-notifier and setxid whitelist
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: libb2-0.98.1 on Rawhide
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Fedora-31-20190923.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190923.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: How to subscribe to Bugzilla components?
- Re: libb2-0.98.1 on Rawhide
- Re: How to subscribe to Bugzilla components?
- How to subscribe to Bugzilla components?
- Re: Unresponsive maintainers: Alex Chernyakhovsky & Othman Madjoudj
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges
- Re: Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges
- Re: Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges
- From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
- Re: Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges
- Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges
- From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Re: Building for EPEL 8 -- missing kernel-headers-4.18.0-80.11.1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Orphaned tagsoup
- Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)
- Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration
- Re: Looking for a maintainer for freemedforms
- Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-09-23)
- Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)
- orphaning nodejs-flot and js-excanvas
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Looking for a maintainer for freemedforms
- Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
- Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
- Re: Building for EPEL 8 -- missing kernel-headers-4.18.0-80.11.1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
- Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
- Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
- Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190922.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
- Fedora-Rawhide-20190922.n.1 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
- Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
- Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
- Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
- Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190922.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)
- Re: [NeuroFedora] Re: Please welcome @alciregi to the packager group
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
- Font package review
- Re: systemd-sysusers versus containers
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Fedora-31-20190921.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190921.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190921.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Branched 20190921.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
- Fedora-Rawhide-20190921.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora 31 Final blocker status email #2
- [Test-Announce] 2019-09-23 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 31 Blocker Review Meeting
- [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-09-23 Fedora QA Meeting
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190920.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Fedora-Rawhide-20190920.n.1 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Przemek Klosowski via devel
- Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
- Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Autoregenerate https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues
- Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: mpfr-4.0.2
- Autoregenerate https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues
- Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
- Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
- Re: Building for EPEL 8 -- missing kernel-headers-4.18.0-80.11.1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
- Re: [NeuroFedora] Please welcome @alciregi to the packager group
- Fedora-31-20190920.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190920.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Audio packages depending on python2
- Re: Please welcome @alciregi to the packager group
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Please welcome @alciregi to the packager group
- Re: Audio packages depending on python2
- Building for EPEL 8 -- missing kernel-headers-4.18.0-80.11.1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
- Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
- Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
- Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
- Audio packages depending on python2
- Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)
- perl-Geo-Point and perl-Geo-Proj4 retired in Fedora 32
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Updating double-conversion in rawhide
- Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Re: No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories
- Fedora-31-20190919.n.1 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190919.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Django 3
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
- Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
- Re: Orphaning some packages
- Re: libb2-0.98.1 on Rawhide
- Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: specfile dependecy to pip package
- Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Logs from Open NeuroFedora team meeting at 1500 UTC on Thursday, 19th September
- Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
- Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: specfile dependecy to pip package
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: specfile dependecy to pip package
- Re: specfile dependecy to pip package
- specfile dependecy to pip package
- Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
- Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
- Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
- Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
- YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
- Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
- Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
- Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190919.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Fedora-Rawhide-20190919.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- aarch64 test systems implementation
- Re: Retiring u2f-hidraw-policy soon!
- orphaning python-cassandra-driver
- Re: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in low-memory situations
- Re: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in low-memory situations
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190918.n.2 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in low-memory situations
- Please test varnish-6.0.4-2.fc29
- Fedora-Rawhide-20190918.n.2 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: [EXT] Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Renewing the Modularity objective
- Re: [EXT] Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Anderson, Charles R
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Retiring u2f-hidraw-policy soon!
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in low-memory situations
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Minimization Objective report
- Re: Licensing of the bundled libraries
- Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Licensing of the bundled libraries
- Minimization Team Meeting notes 2019-09-18
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Release rpkg-1.59
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Re: systemd-sysusers versus containers
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Fedora-31-20190918.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190918.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- orphaning git-remote-bzr
- Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
- Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- From: Sheogorath via devel
- Licensing of the bundled libraries
- Open NeuroFedora team meeting: 1500 UTC on Thursday, 19th September
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Branched 20190918.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
- glassfish-el-3.0.1~b11 license change
- python-asgiref license change
- Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
- Re: About OCaml 4.08.1 final for F31 and rebuild tracking
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Alexander Ploumistos
- Re: Self Introduction ljavorsk
- Re: plan to orphan cassandra
- From: Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira
- Fedora 31 compose report: 20190917.n.2 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- HEADS UP: License change for rust-adler32
- Fedora-31-20190917.n.2 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Help needed with failing PPC build: cannot find MPI with openmpi
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- From: John M. Harris, Jr.
- Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- [modularity] Modularity Team Meeting Minutes (Sept 17, 2019)
- Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT
- From: Gwyn Ciesla via devel
- Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT
- Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
- Re: systemd-sysusers versus containers
- Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration
- Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Comp Neuro Lab
- Review swap
- Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190916.0
- Re: plan to orphan cassandra
- Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT
- From: Gwyn Ciesla via devel
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
- Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
- Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
- Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
- Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
- Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
- Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
- Self Introduction ljavorsk
- Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT
- Re: Fedora package in EPEL
- About to orphan FreeGLUT
- Re: systemd-sysusers versus containers
- Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
- Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
- Re: No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories
- Which arch should we add to Copr?
- Re: Help needed with failing PPC build: cannot find MPI with openmpi
- Re: Proven packager help request: DCMTK (and dependent packages) require update in F29/F30
- Re: DNF system-upgrade instructions on docs.fp.o
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: DNF system-upgrade instructions on docs.fp.o
- Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration
- Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
- Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
- Re: Fedora package in EPEL
- Fedora package in EPEL
- From: Muneendra Kumar M via devel
- Re: memory leak in gnome-shell 3.34.0 ?
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
- Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
- Re: No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories
- Re: No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories
- Re: No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]