On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 13:03, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:12:41AM +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote: > > I think this is a problem that the rsh package is in normal RHEL8 (not > > sure in which stream) and if I am right, packages in rhel can not be in > > epel too. > > > When we get modularity up and working for EPEL-8, we'll need to figure out > how to handle that, as we want to be able to provide alternate versions as > non-default streams. > I hope so. I think the decisions are made by the PDC which is going to be tricky. > > On another note: rsh? Really? :) Turns out some amount embedded hardware only works with rsh. The we put it in 10 years ago and we aren't getting a new bridge anytime soon so it works with what its got kind of hardware. > -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
