On 01. 11. 19 10:21, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 11. 19 10:11, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
Yeah, looks like mass rebuild just skips these packages:
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/master/f/scripts/mass-rebuild.py#_125
I am wondering if it wouldn't make sense to do a scratch build in that case
and proceed with normal FTBS policy [0] if it fails.
The policy will eventually kick in. Recent changes make it so that packages that
haven't rebuilt for certain number of releases will be retired with
announcements. Even if releng have never attempted to do so.
That means that if packages with noautobuild fail to build, nobody will notice
for ~year and than the maintainer have 6 weeks to fix it. \o/
I strongly suggest we should revisit all our noautobuild packages.
For example, for tk, the commit says:
2014-05-21 Added noautobuild, tcl/tk-8.6 cannot be automatically rebuild now
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tk/c/90966fa?branch=master
But the package was rebuilt couple times in the last 5 years actually.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
