Fedora Development Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Update pushed to F31 updates-testing not happening ?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Intent to unretire qm-dsp
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fwd: bodhi submitted ntl-11.3.4-1.fc32 to stable
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Vagrant 2.2 / Fedora 30+ issues anyone?
  • From: Pavel Valena
• Fwd: bodhi submitted ntl-11.3.4-1.fc32 to stable
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Update pushed to F31 updates-testing not happening ?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: CGAL soname "bump" in rawhide
  • From: laurent . rineau__fedora
• Re: Unretire nodejs-gaze
  • From: Jared K. Smith
• Re: CGAL soname "bump" in rawhide
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Intent to unretire qm-dsp
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: HEADS UP: Rawhide rebuild of Python packages with old bytecode version
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Finding out ownership of packages & branches
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Update pushed to F31 updates-testing not happening ?
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Update pushed to F31 updates-testing not happening ?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: HEADS UP: Rawhide rebuild of Python packages with old bytecode version
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: jkonecny
• HEADS UP: Rawhide rebuild of Python packages with old bytecode version
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• HEADS-UP: PJHP 7.4 coming to rawhide
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Fedora-29-updates-testing-20191002.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• cmake 3.15.3 coming to rawhide
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Brian (bex) Exelbierd
• Re: How to subscribe to Bugzilla components?
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191001.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20191001.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Planned Outage - koji.fedoraproject.org - 2019-10-02 21:00 UTC
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Hans de Goede
• CGAL soname "bump" in rawhide
  • From: laurent . rineau__fedora
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Unretire nodejs-gaze
  • From: Ben Rosser
• packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: laurent . rineau__fedora
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Joe Doss
• Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Ricardo Bánffy
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Pavel Valena
• Fedora-31-20191001.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20191001.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Self-Introduction: Christopher Engelhard
  • From: Christopher Engelhard
• Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Akira TAGOH
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Peter Pentchev
• Re: Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Petr Pisar
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190930.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Re: CPE Team Weekly Update
  • From: Dusty Mabe
• Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: Finding out ownership of packages & branches
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Finding out ownership of packages & branches
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Finding out ownership of packages & branches
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Jan Pokorný
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Pavel Valena
• Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-09-30)
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: can we merge package.cfg into master ?
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
  • From: Dario Lesca
• Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Reminder: Summer time changes in the next few weeks
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: James Cassell
• hypre soname bump in rawhide
  • From: Dave Love
• Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
  • From: Dario Lesca
• Re: Self Introduction: Brian Sipos
  • From: Brian Sipos
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190930.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-09-30)
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190930.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Matthias Runge
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michael J Gruber
• Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Ricardo Bánffy
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Self Introduction: Jérémy Bertozzi
  • From: Jérémy Bertozzi
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Artur Iwicki
• Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Orphaned libfixposix (leaf package)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: gnome-subtitles (mono) dependency on libenchant.so.1 not picked up automatically
  • From: Timotheus Pokorra
• suitesparse 5.4 coming to rawhide soon
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Backend storage clean-up
  • From: Jakub Kadlcik
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Orphaned pegdown (leaf package)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: gnome-subtitles (mono) dependency on libenchant.so.1 not picked up automatically
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• gnome-subtitles (mono) dependency on libenchant.so.1 not picked up automatically
  • From: Julian Sikorski
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190928.n.2 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190928.n.2 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Self Introduction: Brian Sipos
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Package build of usbauth-notifier and setxid whitelist
  • From: Stefan Koch
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190928.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora-31-20190928.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Branched 20190928.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Re: kata containers: adding a docker runtime
  • From: Daniel Walsh
• 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190927.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora-31-20190927.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Question about package module development
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Fedora 31 Final blocker status email #3
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Matthew Miller
• [Test-Announce] 2019-09-30 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 31 Blocker Review Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] 2019-09-30 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Question about package module development
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Help needed with reviewing 2 trivial Golang packages
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• A Gmane NNTP gatway test
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Neal Gompa
• can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Unresponsive Maintainer: bpereto
  • From: Felix Kaechele via devel
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Pete Walter
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Tom Stellard
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• dogpile.cache has switched to the MIT license
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Question about package module development
  • From: Coty Sutherland
• Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Jiri Hladky
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Martin Kolman
• plplot soname bump in rawhide
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
• CPE Team Weekly Update
  • From: Aoife Moloney
• Re: Question about package module development
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabien Boucher
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabien Boucher
• Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Jiri Hladky
• Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
• Re: MPFR 4
  • From: James Paul Turner
• Question about package module development
  • From: Coty Sutherland
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Self Introduction: Brian Sipos
  • From: Brian Sipos
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Tristan Cacqueray
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Tom Stellard
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Troy Dawson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Tom Stellard
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robert Marcano via devel
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Logs from Open NeuroFedora team meeting at 1500 UTC on Thursday, 26th September.
  • From: Aniket Pradhan
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Steven A. Falco
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Brian C. Lane
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Adrian Reber
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: Brian C. Lane
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Troy Dawson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Troy Dawson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Fedora-31-20190926.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190926.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Remi Collet
• Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: new non-responsive maintainer policy
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: new non-responsive maintainer policy
  • From: Richard Shaw
• new non-responsive maintainer policy
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Jiri Hladky
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Ryan Walklin
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• FedoraRespin-30-updates-20190925.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-09-26 16:00 UTC)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
  • From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: kata containers: adding a docker runtime
  • From: Tomasz Torcz
• Re: Join the package collection maintainers: Visit src.fp.o to request rights?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Dependency issues with mono on F31?
  • From: Andrea Musuruane
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31
  • From: Stephan Bergmann
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31
  • From: Stephan Bergmann
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Minimization Objective report
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Intent to retire cudd
  • From: Jerry James
• The last regular Minimization Team Meeting notes 2019-09-25
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31
  • From: Stephan Bergmann
• Join the package collection maintainers: Visit src.fp.o to request rights?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Fedora-31-20190925.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190925.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: intent to orphan: vte, trac*
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Dependency issues with mono on F31?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• notify-python orphan notice
  • From: Paul Frields
• Re: plan to retire llvm3.9 from f31+
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kaleb Keithley
• Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
  • From: Martin Kolman
• kata containers: adding a docker runtime
  • From: Christophe de Dinechin
• plan to retire llvm3.9 from f31+
  • From: Jens-Ulrik Petersen
• Dependency issues with mono on F31?
  • From: Andrea Musuruane
• Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Andreas Gerstmayr
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
  • From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190924.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: What projects can we highlight for Hacktoberfest?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
  • From: Brian C. Lane
• HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting
  • From: asamalik
• Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Request to add new groups to comps.xml
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Open NeuroFedora team meeting: 1500 UTC on Thursday, 26th September
  • From: MeWjOr
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival
  • From: Leigh Scott
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: Package build of usbauth-notifier and setxid whitelist
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190923.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190923.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Solomon Peachy
• Package build of usbauth-notifier and setxid whitelist
  • From: Stefan Koch
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Markus Larsson
• Re: libb2-0.98.1 on Rawhide
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Markus Larsson
• Fedora-31-20190923.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190923.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Solomon Peachy
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Markus Larsson
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: How to subscribe to Bugzilla components?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: libb2-0.98.1 on Rawhide
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: How to subscribe to Bugzilla components?
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• How to subscribe to Bugzilla components?
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Unresponsive maintainers: Alex Chernyakhovsky & Othman Madjoudj
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges
  • From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
• Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Dave Love
• Re: Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges
  • From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
• Re: Building for EPEL 8 -- missing kernel-headers-4.18.0-80.11.1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Orphaned tagsoup
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Looking for a maintainer for freemedforms
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-09-23)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: Intent to orphan dblatex (asciidoc dependency)
  • From: Michael J Gruber
• orphaning nodejs-flot and js-excanvas
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Looking for a maintainer for freemedforms
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: Building for EPEL 8 -- missing kernel-headers-4.18.0-80.11.1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
  • From: Jan Pazdziora
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190922.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190922.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190922.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Re: [NeuroFedora] Re: Please welcome @alciregi to the packager group
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Leigh Scott
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Leigh Scott
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Font package review
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: systemd-sysusers versus containers
  • From: John M. Harris Jr.
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Fedora-31-20190921.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190921.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190921.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Branched 20190921.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190921.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 Final blocker status email #2
  • From: Ben Cotton
• [Test-Announce] 2019-09-23 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 31 Blocker Review Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-09-23 Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190920.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190920.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Przemek Klosowski via devel
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: Brian C. Lane
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kaleb Keithley
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Autoregenerate https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: mpfr-4.0.2
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Autoregenerate https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Building for EPEL 8 -- missing kernel-headers-4.18.0-80.11.1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kaleb Keithley
• Re: [NeuroFedora] Please welcome @alciregi to the packager group
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Fedora-31-20190920.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190920.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Audio packages depending on python2
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: Please welcome @alciregi to the packager group
  • From: Alain Vigne
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: jkonecny
• Please welcome @alciregi to the packager group
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Audio packages depending on python2
  • From: Leigh Scott
• Building for EPEL 8 -- missing kernel-headers-4.18.0-80.11.1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
  • From: Jan Pazdziora
• Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Dave Love
• Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Dave Love
• Audio packages depending on python2
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• perl-Geo-Point and perl-Geo-Proj4 retired in Fedora 32
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Gordon Messmer
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Gordon Messmer
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Chris Adams
• Updating double-conversion in rawhide
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kaleb Keithley
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Fedora-31-20190919.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190919.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Mohan Boddu
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Django 3
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Orphaning some packages
  • From: Michal Ambroz
• Re: libb2-0.98.1 on Rawhide
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: specfile dependecy to pip package
  • From: Marek Tamaskovic
• Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Logs from Open NeuroFedora team meeting at 1500 UTC on Thursday, 19th September
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Dave Love
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Michal Ambroz
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: specfile dependecy to pip package
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: specfile dependecy to pip package
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: specfile dependecy to pip package
  • From: Vascom
• specfile dependecy to pip package
  • From: Marek Tamaskovic
• Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
  • From: John Florian
• Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: Michal Schorm
• Re: aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: Petr Pisar
• YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kaleb Keithley
• Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
  • From: Kalpa Welivitigoda
• Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: Michal Schorm
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190919.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190919.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• aarch64 test systems implementation
  • From: Dave Love
• Re: Retiring u2f-hidraw-policy soon!
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• orphaning python-cassandra-driver
  • From: Lumir Balhar
• Re: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in low-memory situations
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in low-memory situations
  • From: Tom Seewald
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190918.n.2 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in low-memory situations
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Please test varnish-6.0.4-2.fc29
  • From: Ingvar Hagelund
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190918.n.2 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: [EXT] Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: [EXT] Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Anderson, Charles R
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Retiring u2f-hidraw-policy soon!
  • From: Andrew Lutomirski
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: Debarshi Ray
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in low-memory situations
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Minimization Objective report
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Licensing of the bundled libraries
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Licensing of the bundled libraries
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Minimization Team Meeting notes 2019-09-18
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Release rpkg-1.59
  • From: Ondrej Nosek
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: systemd-sysusers versus containers
  • From: Troy Dawson
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Fedora-31-20190918.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190918.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Michal Schorm
• orphaning git-remote-bzr
  • From: Petr Stodulka
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: Ernestas Kulik
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins
  • From: Vascom
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: Sheogorath via devel
• Licensing of the bundled libraries
  • From: Michal Schorm
• Open NeuroFedora team meeting: 1500 UTC on Thursday, 19th September
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Branched 20190918.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: Ismael Olea
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: alciregi
• Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: Felipe Borges
• Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes
  • From: alciregi
• glassfish-el-3.0.1~b11 license change
  • From: Marián Konček
• python-asgiref license change
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: About OCaml 4.08.1 final for F31 and rebuild tracking
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: Self Introduction ljavorsk
  • From: Damien Durand
• Re: plan to orphan cassandra
  • From: Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190917.n.2 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• HEADS UP: License change for rust-adler32
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Fedora-31-20190917.n.2 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: sixpack13
• Re: Help needed with failing PPC build: cannot find MPI with openmpi
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: sixpack13
• [modularity] Modularity Team Meeting Minutes (Sept 17, 2019)
  • From: Langdon White
• Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla via devel
• Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT
  • From: Adam Jackson
• Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: systemd-sysusers versus containers
  • From: Daniel Walsh
• Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Comp Neuro Lab
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Review swap
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190916.0
  • From: noreply
• Re: plan to orphan cassandra
  • From: Honza Horak
• Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: About to orphan FreeGLUT
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla via devel
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: jkonecny
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting
  • From: asamalik
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Mohan Boddu
• Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?
  • From: Nicolas Chauvet