Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in Non-Modular Buildroot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 7:42 AM Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Similarly, the example of "build on Rawhide, run anywhere" was
> backwards. I should have said "build on oldest supported Fedora, carry
> through".

Modules currently fail at this because they have a platform
dependency. And we could *easily* permit it for non-modular packages
if we actually wanted it. I think we've generally said we don't want
to maintain content that can't be built for current releases, so this
is problematic.

Also, if we did this, we should drop the DistTag, because it confuses
people otherwise.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux