On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:17 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 17. 10. 19 2:41, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > For example, we might have packages whose buildsystem > > still relies on Python 2 (WAF?) but doesn't require it at runtime. > > We do have them. How does that relate to modularity at all? > That was a representative example. I came up with it at 11pm after a long day. Don't read too much into the specifics. The point was that builds may require newer or older software than we have available in the non-modular buildroot, but don't require them at runtime. Similarly, the example of "build on Rawhide, run anywhere" was backwards. I should have said "build on oldest supported Fedora, carry through". _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx