Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> That's my point -- requiring parallel installability is not really a
> MUST, especially in my area. You are driving this requirement as if
> nothing else could solve your issues.

I am not. This is a strawman.

What I am saying is that modules on which other modules have versioned 
dependencies cause version conflicts if they are not parallel-installable 
(which is sadly the case now). There is no need for different versions of 
leaf modules to be parallel-installable in most cases. (It could be useful 
in some special cases, such as the game Battle for Wesnoth where savegames 
are only usable with a specific release branch, but that is not the common 
case. For the typical server application, I agree that it would be useless.)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux