Re: Next F31 push?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sérgio Basto wrote:
> AFAIK , the logic is request an freeze exception , or next push will be
> just after F31 GA .
> I'd like have one unfreeze and push all packages that are waiting to be
> pushed to stable, when we have an NO-GO.
> I already made this request in past and, in resume, the idea was
> rejected with some valid arguments, which I accepted ...

I have also made this request more than once and would still be in favor of 
it, but the QA team is worried that this would introduce more bugs and 
either delay the release further or make us ship with more bugs. It is a 
tough call. I think such long freezes are a pain for packagers and also 
delay (and keep out of the GA images) bug fixes and even security fixes 
(also because the stable release updates are affected too if you do not want 
to break the upgrade path), but I also understand where QA is coming from.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux