Fedora Development Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Pavel Valena
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Intent to replace bzr (bazaar) with brz (breezy)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: psutter pushed to iproute (master). "iproute-5.3.0-2 (..more)"
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Intent to replace bzr (bazaar) with brz (breezy)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Intent to replace bzr (bazaar) with brz (breezy)
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Intent to replace bzr (bazaar) with brz (breezy)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Intent to replace bzr (bazaar) with brz (breezy)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: jnovy pushed to mc (master). "- just keep perl-interpreter BR because of man2hlp, (..more)"
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Intent to replace bzr (bazaar) with brz (breezy)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: FreeCAD required updates (PySide2 & Coin4)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: FreeCAD required updates (PySide2 & Coin4)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: FreeCAD required updates (PySide2 & Coin4)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: FreeCAD required updates (PySide2 & Coin4)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: removing Xen from Fedora release criteria
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• removing Xen from Fedora release criteria
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Alexander Scheel
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: what to do without fedocal [was Re: CPE Team Weekly Update: 2019-10-04]
  • From: Brian (bex) Exelbierd
• Re: FreeCAD required updates (PySide2 & Coin4)
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Matthew Miller
• FreeCAD required updates (PySide2 & Coin4)
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Christian Dersch
• Non-responsive procedure for daveisfera
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Tomasz Torcz
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Simo Sorce
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Alexander Scheel
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Simo Sorce
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-10-07)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: what to do without fedocal [was Re: CPE Team Weekly Update: 2019-10-04]
  • From: Matthew Miller
• howto rust in F32
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Fedora-31-20191007.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20191007.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-10-07)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Jaroslav Mracek
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: jnovy pushed to mc (master). "- just keep perl-interpreter BR because of man2hlp, (..more)"
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Branched 20191007.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: David Kaufmann
• Re: jnovy pushed to mc (master). "- just keep perl-interpreter BR because of man2hlp, (..more)"
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191007.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20191007.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Peter Pentchev
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: jnovy pushed to mc (master). "- just keep perl-interpreter BR because of man2hlp, (..more)"
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?
  • From: Petr Stodulka
• VIT version 2 changed license from GPL to MIT
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-10-07)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: jnovy pushed to mc (master). "- just keep perl-interpreter BR because of man2hlp, (..more)"
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Failing f31 spins/labs/images
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: This update's test gating status has been changed to, 'greenwave_failed'.
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: cc1plus getting killed on ppc64le builds
  • From: Dan Horák
• GNOME 3.34.1 megaupdate
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: Making testing of package updates easier
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fedora 31 time date format on top bar does not reflect region setting
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: cc1plus getting killed on ppc64le builds
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Question about package module development
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Making testing of package updates easier
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Fedora-31-20191006.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 time date format on top bar does not reflect region setting
  • From: Thomas via devel
• cc1plus getting killed on ppc64le builds
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20191006.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Failing f31 spins/labs/images
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora-Rawhide-20191006.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191006.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: This update's test gating status has been changed to, 'greenwave_failed'.
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Question about package module development
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Failing f31 spins/labs/images
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: tracker-devel missing from el8 repos
  • From: Andrew Bauer
• Re: tracker-devel missing from el8 repos
  • From: Neal Gompa
• tracker-devel missing from el8 repos
  • From: Andrew Bauer
• Re: This update's test gating status has been changed to, 'greenwave_failed'.
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• This update's test gating status has been changed to, 'greenwave_failed'.
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Failing f31 spins/labs/images
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Packaging OnlyOffice Desktop Editors
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Vim :Gbrowse support for pagure
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Packaging OnlyOffice Desktop Editors
  • From: Germano Massullo
• Re: Packaging OnlyOffice Desktop Editors
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Packaging OnlyOffice Desktop Editors
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Packaging OnlyOffice Desktop Editors
  • From: Germano Massullo
• Failing f31 spins/labs/images
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: New updates straight to obsolete after Epoch bump?!?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Vim :Gbrowse support for pagure
  • From: Jakub Kadlcik
• Re: New updates straight to obsolete after Epoch bump?!?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: New updates straight to obsolete after Epoch bump?!?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191005.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20191005.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora-31-20191005.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20191005.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: what to do without fedocal [was Re: CPE Team Weekly Update: 2019-10-04]
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: what to do without fedocal [was Re: CPE Team Weekly Update: 2019-10-04]
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Intent to retire libvtemm
  • From: Krzesimir Nowak
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Koji shows root.log to blame when in fact the error is in build.log
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: what to do without fedocal [was Re: CPE Team Weekly Update: 2019-10-04]
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer drago01
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Unresponsive Package Maintainer drago01
  • From: Chris
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Koji shows root.log to blame when in fact the error is in build.log
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191004.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora 31 Final blocker status email #4
  • From: Ben Cotton
• what to do without fedocal [was Re: CPE Team Weekly Update: 2019-10-04]
  • From: Matthew Miller
• [Test-Announce] 2019-10-07 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 31 Blocker Review Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-10-07 Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Przemek Klosowski via devel
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Björn Persson
• CPE Team Weekly Update: 2019-10-04
  • From: Aoife Moloney
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Don't add default contents in `fedpkg request-branch` tickets Was: Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Don't add default contents in `fedpkg request-branch` tickets Was: Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Don't add default contents in `fedpkg request-branch` tickets Was: Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Fedocal will be decommissioned on October 15th
  • From: Aoife Moloney
• Usage of wildcards in systemd RPM scriptlets broken on fedora >= 31?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Modularity and the system-upgrade path
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: FreeGLUT update with soname bump
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla via devel
• Highlights from the latest Copr release
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: FreeGLUT update with soname bump
  • From: Adam Jackson
• FreeGLUT update with soname bump
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla via devel
• Fedora-31-20191004.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: New updates straight to obsolete after Epoch bump?!?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: New updates straight to obsolete after Epoch bump?!?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20191004.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Björn Persson
• Provisional pyproject RPM macros: Dynamic BuildRequires for Python packages
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Koji shows root.log to blame when in fact the error is in build.log
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Self Introduction: Matěj Grabovský
  • From: Matej Grabovsky
• Fwd: fedora 31 some funky mouse behavior
  • From: Thomas via devel
• Re: separate authentication for override creation
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• separate authentication for override creation
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Don't add default contents in `fedpkg request-branch` tickets Was: Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Don't add default contents in `fedpkg request-branch` tickets Was: Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Nicolas Chauvet
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: HEADS-UP: PJHP 7.4 coming to rawhide
  • From: Remi Collet
• Fedora-31-20191003.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20191003.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: New updates straight to obsolete after Epoch bump?!?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Fwd: bodhi submitted ntl-11.3.4-1.fc32 to stable
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Fwd: bodhi submitted ntl-11.3.4-1.fc32 to stable
  • From: Jerry James
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Branched 20191003.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: License in spec file
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• License in spec file
  • From: alciregi
• Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: binutils 2.33
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Request to re-review jboss-logging-tools package
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Don't add default contents in `fedpkg request-branch` tickets Was: Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Request to re-review jboss-logging-tools package
  • From: Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan Krishnamoorthy
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Logs of the weekly NeuroFedora meeting: October 3, 2019
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabien Boucher
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Chris Adams
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Ohio LinuxFest 2019
  • From: Geoffrey Marr
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Chris Adams
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Chris Adams
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Old changelog entries removal
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Fwd: [rpms/future] PR #5: re-enable future for python2
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Minimization Objective report
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Intent to orphan python-unittest2
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• postgresql.service (postgresql-11.5-1.fc30)
  • From: Mischa Baars
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Jared K. Smith
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: CGAL soname "bump" in rawhide
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-10-03 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Unretire nodejs-gaze
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Review swap (htslib)
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20191001.0
  • From: Dusty Mabe
• Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20191001.0
  • From: noreply
• Re: Unretire nodejs-gaze
  • From: Jared K. Smith
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Simo Sorce
• New updates straight to obsolete after Epoch bump?!?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Colin Walters
• Ohio LinuxFest 2019
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Update pushed to F31 updates-testing not happening ?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Intent to unretire qm-dsp
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fwd: bodhi submitted ntl-11.3.4-1.fc32 to stable
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Vagrant 2.2 / Fedora 30+ issues anyone?
  • From: Pavel Valena
• Fwd: bodhi submitted ntl-11.3.4-1.fc32 to stable
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Update pushed to F31 updates-testing not happening ?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: CGAL soname "bump" in rawhide
  • From: laurent . rineau__fedora
• Re: Unretire nodejs-gaze
  • From: Jared K. Smith
• Re: CGAL soname "bump" in rawhide
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Intent to unretire qm-dsp
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: HEADS UP: Rawhide rebuild of Python packages with old bytecode version
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Finding out ownership of packages & branches
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Update pushed to F31 updates-testing not happening ?
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Update pushed to F31 updates-testing not happening ?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: HEADS UP: Rawhide rebuild of Python packages with old bytecode version
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: jkonecny
• HEADS UP: Rawhide rebuild of Python packages with old bytecode version
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• HEADS-UP: PJHP 7.4 coming to rawhide
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Fedora-29-updates-testing-20191002.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• cmake 3.15.3 coming to rawhide
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Brian (bex) Exelbierd
• Re: How to subscribe to Bugzilla components?
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191001.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20191001.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Planned Outage - koji.fedoraproject.org - 2019-10-02 21:00 UTC
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Hans de Goede
• CGAL soname "bump" in rawhide
  • From: laurent . rineau__fedora
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Unretire nodejs-gaze
  • From: Ben Rosser
• packaging: upgrade a library to a header-only library
  • From: laurent . rineau__fedora
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Joe Doss
• Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Ricardo Bánffy
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Pavel Valena
• Fedora-31-20191001.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20191001.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Self-Introduction: Christopher Engelhard
  • From: Christopher Engelhard
• Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Akira TAGOH
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Peter Pentchev
• Re: Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Petr Pisar
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190930.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Re: CPE Team Weekly Update
  • From: Dusty Mabe
• Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: Finding out ownership of packages & branches
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Finding out ownership of packages & branches
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Finding out ownership of packages & branches
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Jan Pokorný
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Pavel Valena
• Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-09-30)
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: can we merge package.cfg into master ?
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
  • From: Dario Lesca
• Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Reminder: Summer time changes in the next few weeks
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: James Cassell
• hypre soname bump in rawhide
  • From: Dave Love
• Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"
  • From: Dario Lesca
• Re: Self Introduction: Brian Sipos
  • From: Brian Sipos
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190930.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-09-30)
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190930.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Matthias Runge
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michael J Gruber
• Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Ricardo Bánffy
• Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Self Introduction: Jérémy Bertozzi
  • From: Jérémy Bertozzi
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Artur Iwicki
• Orphaned paper-icon-theme
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Orphaned libfixposix (leaf package)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: gnome-subtitles (mono) dependency on libenchant.so.1 not picked up automatically
  • From: Timotheus Pokorra
• suitesparse 5.4 coming to rawhide soon
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Backend storage clean-up
  • From: Jakub Kadlcik
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Orphaned pegdown (leaf package)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: gnome-subtitles (mono) dependency on libenchant.so.1 not picked up automatically
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• gnome-subtitles (mono) dependency on libenchant.so.1 not picked up automatically
  • From: Julian Sikorski
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190928.n.2 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190928.n.2 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Self Introduction: Brian Sipos
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Package build of usbauth-notifier and setxid whitelist
  • From: Stefan Koch
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190928.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora-31-20190928.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Branched 20190928.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Re: kata containers: adding a docker runtime
  • From: Daniel Walsh
• 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190927.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora-31-20190927.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Question about package module development
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Fedora 31 Final blocker status email #3
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Minimization Objective report
  • From: Matthew Miller
• [Test-Announce] 2019-09-30 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 31 Blocker Review Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] 2019-09-30 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Question about package module development
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Help needed with reviewing 2 trivial Golang packages
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• A Gmane NNTP gatway test
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Neal Gompa
• can we merge package.cfg into master
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Unresponsive Maintainer: bpereto
  • From: Felix Kaechele via devel
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Pete Walter
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Tom Stellard
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• dogpile.cache has switched to the MIT license
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Question about package module development
  • From: Coty Sutherland
• Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Jiri Hladky
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Martin Kolman
• plplot soname bump in rawhide
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
• CPE Team Weekly Update
  • From: Aoife Moloney
• Re: Question about package module development
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabien Boucher
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabien Boucher
• Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Jiri Hladky
• Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
• Re: MPFR 4
  • From: James Paul Turner
• Question about package module development
  • From: Coty Sutherland
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Self Introduction: Brian Sipos
  • From: Brian Sipos
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Tristan Cacqueray
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Tom Stellard
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Troy Dawson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Tom Stellard
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robert Marcano via devel
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Logs from Open NeuroFedora team meeting at 1500 UTC on Thursday, 26th September.
  • From: Aniket Pradhan
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Steven A. Falco
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Brian C. Lane
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Adrian Reber
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: Brian C. Lane
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Troy Dawson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Troy Dawson
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Fedora-31-20190926.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190926.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Remi Collet
• Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Proposal to use repo files in Anaconda environment
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: new non-responsive maintainer policy
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: new non-responsive maintainer policy
  • From: Richard Shaw
• new non-responsive maintainer policy
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Unresponsive maintainer: Hannes Frederic Sowa
  • From: Jiri Hladky
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Ryan Walklin
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• FedoraRespin-30-updates-20190925.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-09-26 16:00 UTC)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
  • From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: kata containers: adding a docker runtime
  • From: Tomasz Torcz
• Re: Join the package collection maintainers: Visit src.fp.o to request rights?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Dependency issues with mono on F31?
  • From: Andrea Musuruane
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• epel-8-{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64} chroots enabled in copr
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31
  • From: Stephan Bergmann
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31
  • From: Stephan Bergmann
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Minimization Objective report
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Intent to retire cudd
  • From: Jerry James
• The last regular Minimization Team Meeting notes 2019-09-25
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31
  • From: Stephan Bergmann
• Join the package collection maintainers: Visit src.fp.o to request rights?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Fedora-31-20190925.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190925.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: intent to orphan: vte, trac*
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Dependency issues with mono on F31?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• notify-python orphan notice
  • From: Paul Frields
• Re: plan to retire llvm3.9 from f31+
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again
  • From: Kaleb Keithley
• Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
  • From: Martin Kolman
• kata containers: adding a docker runtime
  • From: Christophe de Dinechin
• plan to retire llvm3.9 from f31+
  • From: Jens-Ulrik Petersen
• Dependency issues with mono on F31?
  • From: Andrea Musuruane
• Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Andreas Gerstmayr
• Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure
  • From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
• Fedora 31 compose report: 20190924.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: What projects can we highlight for Hacktoberfest?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Estimate the size of iso file based on a kickstart file
  • From: Brian C. Lane
• HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting
  • From: asamalik
• Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Renewing the Modularity objective
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Request to add new groups to comps.xml
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Open NeuroFedora team meeting: 1500 UTC on Thursday, 26th September
  • From: MeWjOr
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival
  • From: Leigh Scott
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: Package build of usbauth-notifier and setxid whitelist
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190923.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora-Rawhide-20190923.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Solomon Peachy
• Package build of usbauth-notifier and setxid whitelist
  • From: Stefan Koch
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307
  • From: Markus Larsson