Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Based on those graphs, I'd say there's slow shrinking. It appears to be
> linear since ~2016. But what is interesting, is that the shrinking mostly
> affects "the occasional contributor": the green top 1% appear unchanged,
> the yellow top 10% barely budge, but the last 50% is clearly shrinking.

That is because your recent changes such as Modularity, Silverblue, 
endorsement of Flatpak, etc., are driving new packagers away.

Some changes (e.g., Silverblue and the more or less related rush to Flatpaks 
for everything) falsely make potential new contributors believe that RPM 
packaging skills are no longer needed or wanted here. Others such as 
Modularity actively make it harder for potential RPM packagers to 
contribute. (Modules add complexity and cause problems when a dependency is 
module-only.)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux