Re: Recommending proprietary software in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, October 14, 2019 2:29:49 AM MST mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> John, the third-party software policy was approved after a long and
> contentious debate:
> 
> https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/121
> 
> We request review from Fedora Legal when we believe software may
> present significant risk, such as the recent addition of OpenH264, in
> accordance with the legal policy:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Third_party_software_policies#Leg
> al_requirements
> 
> Michael

I don't have a disagreement with the third-party software policy. However, 
that policy does not include proprietary software. It's good that we can 
reference external repositories such as rpmfusion-free, in my opinion.

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux