Neal Gompa wrote:
> It'd be interesting if an "inverse filter" could be applied. Instead
> of modules shadowing non-modular content, the other way around would
> occur. That would make it easy to clean that up.
And as I pointed out, if the proposal to require a non-modular default
version for all packages were implemented, that "inverse filter" would
actually only have to be the default for two releases (two to support
upgrades skipping one release). Once the users are migrated to the non-
modular default versions, the default could be safely changed back to the
current filter.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
