Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 8:44 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It was damaging when it was happening before we have a way to depend
>> on modules from non-modular content. It essentially forces other
>> packagers to move to modules too. It's a snowball effect. And *right
>> now* modularization is a one way road. I'm pleased to hear that we
>> will get a way to demodularize, but currently we don't have it.
> 
> That's a fair observation. I can only plead my team's lack of
> omnipotence and our willingness to correct our mistakes.

You do not need omnipotence to not deploy a change before the contingency 
plan is ready, only patience.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux