On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:36 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So the PRs were for Rawhide, but the bug I'm trying to fix exists on all
> supported Fedora releases. I wasn't planning on updating F29 at this point
> but F30 does have a lot of life left.
>
> I don't like the idea of major upgrades within a release but the list of
> dependencies (as noted by the list of PRs) is fairly small and through my
> COPR I have found no *build* issues with the update.
>
> I'm open to suggestion here but I don't like leaving broken software in
> Fedora and basically having to tell the user, "It's fixed in Rawhide so
> you'll get it eventually..."
>
> Thoughts?
Let's get everything built and tested in rawhide first. Based
on how this turns out, an update in F30 and F31 might be appropriate
(with a suitably long testing period, etc). I agree that if the version
in stable Fedora is sufficiently broken, it's better to release an
working update with major version changes than to do nothing.
FreeCAD is now built for Rawhide. I don't run rawhide so not much I can test but I did built the same stack in my COPR for F30 and 31 as well and tested FreeCAD as best I could.
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
