On 14. 10. 19 12:16, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Enable module default streams in the buildroot repository for modular
and non-modular RPMs.
== Summary ==
This Change (colloquially referred to as "Ursa Prime") enables the
Koji build-system to include the RPM artifacts provided by module
default streams in the buildroot when building non-modular (or
"traditional") RPMs.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Sgallagh| Stephen Gallagher]]
* Email: sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx
* Responsible WG: Modularity WG
I have already stated this multiple times in other threads, but just so that
nobody claims that I have not given feedback to this change (which has been
claimed for some other changes in a similar situation), I am going to state
this again:
I oppose this change because I believe Miro's proposal to require all
packages to have a non-modular version (i.e., to ship the default stream as
non-modular packages) is the much better approach to the issue and makes
this change proposal entirely moot.
...
* The fedora-modular repository SHOULD be disabled by default on user
machines, matching the current build system behavior. This also helps
enforcing the above policies.
As long as we enforce the policy of no default streams, this is actually
unnecessary. Modules will only be used when people do "dnf module ...".
Regardless whether this is a good or a wrong idea, just makign clear that I have
never proposed to disable modular repos by default.
OTOH I propose that disabling modular repos must be considered a legitimate
action and the distro must remain it's core functionality.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
