Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:11 pm, Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So I guess I am arguing that while the "new package for existing
maintainers" remain at the `fedpkg` level of doing things, the "join the
package collection maintainer" page for newbies, who should not be
assumed to have prior knowledge about rpm, should start at the
`rpmbuild` level and promote them to `fedpkg` when they reach the
"import to SCM" steps.

I don't agree. I can probably count on one hand the number of times I've used rpmbuild directly in the past five years. fedpkg is much simpler, and simple is what we should be promoting to new packagers.

We can all have our own preferred workflow, nothing wrong with that. But the newcomers guide should be as simple as possible. Learning packaging is complex and the fewer tools that new packagers need to learn, the better.

Michael

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux