|
If you would like to have rpmbuild mentioned in the docs, then
mock should be mentioned as well. Or both can be omitted for
simplicity. But definitely, we should not suggest plain rpmbuild
IMO.
Vít
Dne 07. 10. 19 v 11:32 Ankur Sinha
napsal(a):
Hi, I was looking at this quick-docs page[1] which is mentioned in the "New package process for existing contributors" page[2]. It now does not use rpmbuild---it uses `fedpkg` and dist-git. This is also linked to the "Join the package maintainers page"[3]. Is this now the suggested way---and is this what newcomers should be using? I see that it has advantages---once packages are approved, we use dist-git. However, on the other hand, it skips the important bits about how rpmbuild really works. Weirdly enough, even though it's using fedpkg + dist-git and therefore does not use the rpmbuild directories, the page still refers to rpmbuild directories when describing the SPEC at some places. So that's quite confusing, especially for newcomers. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-rpm-packages/index.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_package_process_for_existing_contributors [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Make_a_Package |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
