Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in Non-Modular Buildroot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joe Orton wrote:
> If you don't want to ship any of your packages as modules I think that's
> great and you should continue doing that.  On the other hand, I want to
> move a bunch of my packages to module-only because I think I can do a
> better job serving Fedora users that way.

How so? That is the big question that you are leaving unanswered: In what 
way do you think you can do a better job serving Fedora users with module-
only packages than by also delivering a non-modular version (along with the 
modular version for those who actually want it)?

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux