Re: Recommending proprietary software in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:19 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
By actively offering the proprietary Chrome to the users instead of explaining the above, you are actually pointing them towards using proprietary software instead of Free Software for no reason.

I think you're probably right that people mainly want Chrome for the multimedia support. But well, surely you are well aware that we'll never be able to point to the rpmfusion codecs packages in any official location. I know it's very frustrating, but the legal team is just trying to protect Red Hat (and Fedora). It would be helpful to please keep your argumentation within the realm of the legal constraints we have to respect.

Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux