On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:19 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
By actively offering the proprietary Chrome to the users instead of explaining the above, you are actually pointing them towards using proprietary software instead of Free Software for no reason.
I think you're probably right that people mainly want Chrome for the multimedia support. But well, surely you are well aware that we'll never be able to point to the rpmfusion codecs packages in any official location. I know it's very frustrating, but the legal team is just trying to protect Red Hat (and Fedora). It would be helpful to please keep your argumentation within the realm of the legal constraints we have to respect.
Michael
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
