Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17. 10. 19 2:27, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
So, literally every word of this is wrong. The negative feedback is
not "overwhelming". It is approximately four noisy individuals, all of
whom have expressed zero interest in understanding the actual
situation that they are trying to "fix" by endlessly insulting the
people working on the problem. Demoralizing the people who can dig us
out of this situation is an unwise strategy.

Let me make this clear: I have a technical opinion (default modular streams are the wrong thing to do). If we are not considering that opinion, because it insults the people who have implemented the technical thing, we are making it personal.

Everybody, please keep the discussion technical (that applies to both "sides" here).

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux