Yes, dependent packages should use %{fpc_arches}. FPC itself doesn't do that.
I imagine the reason is that this allows us to add new architectures to FPC and do some trial-and-error builds of FPC without affecting dependent packages - if FPC itself used %{fpc_arches}, then adding new architectures to FPC would require updating fpc-rpm-macros, and that would make all dependent packages fail to build, since the new-arch builds would fail with "Package not found: fpc" until we got FPC available on those.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
