Re: Next F31 push?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 00:11 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Eh. I don't think it's a particularly bad hack at all. It's simple,
> > labelled, we know what it does, and it's inherently limited (it'll
> > never do anything outside of an upgrade to F31).
> 
> That's exactly what makes this such a bad hack in my eyes. It "fixes" one 
> particular instance of this general issue, one that was found during 
> upgrades from F30 to F31. It does not fix any other instances of the bug, 
> even ones that could appear in the future in upgrades from F29 updates or 
> F30 updates to F31 updates. It is also a short-term fix, because the exact 
> same issue with libgit2 will likely still happen on upgrades from F30 to 
> F32, and the workaround is explicitly not applied there.

That's because it's intended to have a proper fix before F32 comes out.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux