On 17. 10. 19 15:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 4:33 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 17. 10. 19 2:27, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
So, literally every word of this is wrong. The negative feedback is
not "overwhelming". It is approximately four noisy individuals, all of
whom have expressed zero interest in understanding the actual
situation that they are trying to "fix" by endlessly insulting the
people working on the problem. Demoralizing the people who can dig us
out of this situation is an unwise strategy.
Let me make this clear: I have a technical opinion (default modular streams are
the wrong thing to do). If we are not considering that opinion, because it
insults the people who have implemented the technical thing, we are making it
personal.
Everybody, please keep the discussion technical (that applies to both "sides" here).
Apologies for the tone here. That was out of line. I need to stop
replying when I'm tired. And I wasn't thinking of you, Miro, when I
wrote this. Your feedback hasn't been "negative", it's been
"constructive" (in the way I think of things).
I appreciate you are trying to follow up on everything here. It must be very
frustrating and I am sorry that my proposal has caused it.
What bothers me ATM is that while the discussion is long and painful, it no
longer moves anywhere :(
IMHO Everybody have already said all their arguments at least twice. I wonder
how to move forward.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
