Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Miller wrote:
> Yeah, I agree that there's a problem with non-parallel-installable modules
> that aren't effectively leaves.

The problem does not only happen if the module is a non-leaf at module 
level, but there can also be conflicts at package level, if the modules 
bundle non-leaf packages that then conflict between the 2 modules. 
(Actually, there could even be package-level conflicts from leaf packages in 
2 different modules, but usually, the conflicting packages are bundled for a 
reason, so they are typically not leaves.) So banning non-leaf modules would 
not by itself be enough to solve the problem (because the modules would then 
resort to bundling the non-leaf packages they need and running into the 
package-level conflicts).

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux