Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 09:31:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier if the "default stream" would just behave like
> a regular package?

Part of the "hybrid modularity" proposal was that the default stream could
_literally_ be tagged into the base repo as non-modular. That has a lot of
appeal to me still!

[...]
> We put the default modular stream into our regular repos, similarly
> to what we try to do in the buildroot. "dnf install Foo" would
> install the Foo package and would not enbale any streams or modules.
> The modular maintainers would keep maintaining the modules as now,
> the infrastructure would compose the defaults into the regular repo
> (or an additional but default-enabled one).

Yeah, like this. :)


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux