Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in Non-Modular Buildroot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10. 10. 19 0:46, Miro Hrončok wrote:> What I miss in the description is:

1. How does this thing actually work? is there an additional repository composed from the default streams available in Koji only?

2. How are conflicts between packages from the default streams and ursine package be handled?

3. What is the local experience if the packager is using mock. What if they are using rpmbuild directly?

4. How are we handling default streams with dependencies on non-default streams of other modules?

I realize that the discussion got side tracked because of my other higher level concerns, but I'd still like to know about this.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux