On 17/10/2019 21:39, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:21:44 PM EDT Tom Hughes wrote:
On 17/10/2019 20:44, Steve Grubb wrote:
I don't think __x86_64__ is defined as the program is aimed at eBPF in
the
kernel. In rawhide, we no longer have glibc-devel(x86-32) to allow this
to
resolve. However, I think that the assumption of not having __x86_64__
defined means we are targeting i686 is wrong. What should I do? Do we not
support eBPF programs on Fedora?
I can still see glibc-devel.i686 in rawhide which provides that.
In rawhide I got [1]:
No matching package to install: 'glibc-devel(x86-32)'
But on my local system, F30, it works fine.
I just tried it with mock on F30:
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --install 'glibc-devel(x86-32)'
and that worked fine.
As far as I know the 32 bit multilib packages aren't going away.
Hmm. I still wonder if the headers might need reworking to not assume 32 bit
if the target is bpf.
I don't know enough about how the BPF backend works to be
able to comment on that.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
